Unleashing The Horrors Of ZUMA



Jun Raquiza's Zuma (Cine Suerte, Inc.) is a filmic take on the macabre set against the spectra of myth. Raquiza presumably resorts to hybridization to underscore the fact that no one paradigm governs how subjectification come to tentative resolutions. The screenplay places Zuma (Max Laurel) in the center of a murderous rampage after being unearthed by an archeological expedition led by Phillip (Mark Gil) and Isabel (Dang Cecilio). Zuma takes a bride, Galela (Racquel Monteza), a madwoman who bore him Galema (Snooky Serna). Her valiant search for Zuma decisively compels her to appropriate strategies, which, while these may excise the demonic curse, place her on new grounds of containment. It is interesting to note how Galema shifts her practice from the clandestine acts of killing, which substantially threaten the conventions of social cohesion, to the assumption of the public role of woman. Such a shift informs much of the ambivalence sustaining the destiny of a social subject who must straddle multiple positions in private and public spheres, as monster, woman, heroine, villainess. The possibilities of creation within the constraints of gender and class relations nourish the terrain in which Zuma takes root, foregrounding the capacities of horror in discussing the ambivalent discourses involved in the construction of modern women and their specific situations.



Zuma attains a degree of difficulty and therefore solicits significant artistic interest. It is interesting because it is sensitive to dimensions. A story of a demigod entombed in an aztec pyramid that shocks a couple of archaeologists out of their wits is only one dimension. For around this plot is the real history that is repressed by a seemingly comfortable order. It is the tale of the son of an aztec serpent God who rips out and eats the hearts of young women. It is this sediment of life that is embodied in this ancient architecture, which is represented not in realistic terms but but in terms that prompt the moviegoer to construe it as a nightmare, a hell into which the innocent is lured, an irrational and impossible place which could only be made contingent on fiction to render it necessarily real. It is this real that differs from the lives of Phillip and Isabel represented luminously by the poreless and seemingly vacant face of Mark Gil and the cluelessness of Dang Cecilio. This sort of reality is vexed until the protagonist is faced with the horror of making a decision to face the creature. That the daughter, the specter of history persist to haunt the apopleptic couple deepens Zuma's dimension. The film is able to maximize the creative powers of Philippine cinema and culture by infusing powerful metaphors and allegories into the concept of blood ties as site of struggle. Zuma vividly translates into film medium, these distillations, produce a mise-en-scene and a rhythm momentum that hack the imperatives of social contestations which , because intelligently horrific, is very cinematic.


Directed By: Jun Raquiza
Screenplay: Manny Rodriguez & Hernan Robles
Based From Characters Created By Jim Fernandez Serialized In Aliwan Komiks
Cinematography: Alfonso Alvarez
Musical Director: Marita Manuel & Demet Velasquez
Film Editor: Serafin Dineros
Production Design: Interformat
Produced By: Cine Suerte, Inc.
Release Date: February 28, 1985

Zuma will be screened at the Mogwai Cinematheque from October 26-31, 2009 at 9pm

SERBIS... Sa Likod Ng Sine


Bold ang oryentasyon ng Serbis (Centerstage Productions / Swift Productions) ngunit may kutob akong maiigpawan ng direktor ang kalabisan ng genre. Noong 2005 kasi, ginawa ni Brillante Mendoza ang Masahista, isang natatanging hayop sa gubat ng bold. Sa madaling salita, inasahan kong magagawan ng paraan ni Mendoza ang kalakal at kalakaran ng paglalako ng katawan sa sine sa kasalukuyan. Nabuhayan ako ng loob sa mga unang eksena ng pelikula. Ang lunan ng naratibo ay isang luma at patakbuhing sinehan sa Pampanga na pinamumugaran ng mga sex worker, bakla, mga nagpaparaos na mga lalaki at parokyano ng mga pelikulang bold. Nagmistulang bulwagan ng salamin ang pelikula, ito ay palabas na bold tungkol sa pagpapalabas ng bold. At masinsin naman ang pagsasametapora ng mekanismo ng pelikula sa pamamagitan ng pagsasalarawan ng maliit na silid ng projectionist, ang pag-ikot ng negatibo at pagtagos ng ilaw sa isang singaw na sinisingawan din ng usok ng sigarilyo at init ng katawan, ang sira-sirang mga upuan na ginaganapan ng krimen ng bawal na seksuwalidad. Pinaghaharian ang milyung ito ni Nanay Flor (Gina Pareno) at mga anak na sina Jewel (Roxanne Jordan) at Nayda (Jaclyn Jose) kasama ang asawang si Lando (Julio Diaz) at anak na si Jonas (Bobby Jerome Go), nariyan din ang projectionist na si Ronald (Kristofer King). Sa sinehang ito rin naninirahan si Alan (Coco Martin) at ibubunyag ang di inaasahang pagdadalantao ng nobyang si Merly (Mercedes Cabral). Sayang na sayang at hindi napangatawanan ng pelikula ang mayabong na tema at diskurso ng naratibo. Mapapansin na pagkatapos na maipundar ang milyu, hindi na alam ng direktor kung paano paandarin ang istorya. Sapat nang ipasubo ang mga bida sa mga kung-anu-anong sitwasyong nangangailangan ng paghuhubad.


Pero maliban sa pagtukoy sa kahinaang ito na siya naman talagang bumalda sa pelikula, napag-iisip ng pelikulang ito ang manonood tungkol sa parametro ng kanilang pagbasa kung ilalapat ang mga ito sa isang obrang tulad ng Serbis. Kung estilo at estilo lamang ang pag-uusapan, walang sinabi ang mga pumupormang magagaling na direktor sa kasalukuyan. Ngunit may iba pa tayong dapat pagkaabalahan bukod sa teknik at teknolohiya at pagpapakitang gilas sa larangan ng visual effects. Tinatanong ko ang aking sarili, halimbawa, kung paano matutugunan ng pelikula ang mga komplikadong isyu na sa unang tingin ay wala namang kinalaman sa sine. Paano kaya mapapalawak ng kritisimong pampelikula ang kanyang abot-tanaw para masipat ang ibang salik na tila labas na sa saklaw ng kanyang tradisyon? Halimbawa, ang antropolohiya ng panonood ng sine. Mababanaag sa pelikulang ito na ang sine ay hindi lamang tekstong pinag-aaralan, kundi isang kulturang isinasabuhay. Talagang napapanahon nang pagtuunan ng pansin ang proseso ng pagtanggap sa pelikula ng mga manonood. Katunayan, sa kasong ito, hindi naman pinapanood ang pelikula, dahil ang sinehan ay nagiging lunan ng ibang gawain. At kung pinapanood naman, nag-uudyok ito ng ibang uri ng alaala at pangitain, napasisiklab nito ang karanasan ng trauma. Sa mga pagkakataong ito, dapat umangkat na ang kritiko ng mga konsepto at metodo sa disiplina ng agham panlipunan para maipaliwanag ang maselang relasyon ng sine at sinehan, imahe at trauma at kung anu-ano pa. Mahalaga rin dito ang usapin ng matriyarka kung saan ang isang matapang na babae ang pumasok sa katauhan ng bana. Siya ba ay humahalili sa lalaki? Bakit binabawian siya ng kagandahang loob at pinagmumukhang sakim? Sa tingin ko, ito ang punot-dulo ng lahat, ang paraan ng ating pagtingin ang siyang susi sa kung anuman ang ating nakikita. Kung makitid ang ating pananaw, wala tayong gaanong makikita at makukulong tayo sa sa kakitiran ng ating mga paniniwala.


Direksiyon: Brillante Ma. Mendoza
Dulang Pampelikula: Armando Lao
Sinematograpiya: Oddysey Flores
Musika: Gian Gianan
Editing: Claire Villa-Real
Disenyong Pamproduksiyon: Benjamin Padero At Carlo Tabije
Prodyuser: Centerstage Produtions At Swift Productions
Release Date: June 25, 2008

PALIPAT-LIPAT PAPALIT-PALIT... Scenes From A Marriage



Palipat-Lipat Papalit-Palit (HPS Productions) never swerves from its goal. From start to finish, it is a portrait of two people and the bond which they discover smothering and smoldering. The movie has tons of humor, the caustic swaps, the funny characterizations, the clever plotting so that the conditioned response for a supposedly serious movie shifts irrevocably to playful irreverence. It is a masterly stroke, the proverbial Lino Brocka sleight of hand at work, this time with more gusto and style. But none may claim that his treatment loses its mark of delineating the disadvantages of separation. The humor chisels the message so that it comes to us double edged while doing its duty of alleviating an otherwise gloomy impression which accompanies every disillusioning subject matter. Not only does it come through humorously but also simply. The screenplay plunges right into the boiling point, the issues hurled to the foreground like the familiar scenes of hatred and division treated like aimless confetti so that the moviegoer neither breathes nor is excused. It jolts at the outset and after the terrible whipping, when the squabbles lessen and finally ebb into peace, we realize that these two handsome people must have had only one tragic flaw, they did not keep mum for a while. Alvaro de Guzman's cinematography dances with the jetstyle rhythm of the two protagonists. From the clever blocking of their wedding day to the hurried bustle of the television studio. the camera sweeps avidly and flawlessly. In his hands, the incessant quarrels of Chuck (Christopher de Leon) and Carissa (Dina Bonnevie) seem like vengeful lovemaking. The long shots are more developed here. Above all, de Guzman's camera has humor and pathos. The production design never digresses from its limited scope but manages to make poetry out of bedrooms and artificial television set-ups. The claustrophobia one feels at the outset of the movie easily renders the hopelessness of the couple's situation. The music filters the emotions of the characters with a detached but effective air. Rene Tala's splendid editing is a breathless canvass of cosmopolitan animation.


The supporting actors are remarkable. Mark Gil as David, Carissa's gay musician friend is not to be denied mention. Chuck's ex-girlfriend Betsy played by Martha Sevilla is a relaxed performer with a talent for effortlessness. Christopher de Leon endows the character of Chuck with the right sense of machismo and basic weakness. When Chuck is compelled to act maturely, de Leon unflinchingly turns him even more childish with useless tantrums, and when Chuck finally learns his lesson, de Leon adds a boyish smile as if the lesson was amusing. We watch de Leon, elated and entertained, he is never so old as to appear too distant, nor is too young as to seem undocile. He is not propelled to be more manly since his character is made to contribute to a lot of oversights, de Leon doesn't have to put a mask of strength, he just has to be himself and act with ease. Dina Bonnevie is not about to be a letdown. She infuses new intelligence in her portrayal of Carissa. Like de Leon, she turns Carissa into a woman-child, but the stress is less on her part. Her beautiful face is flush receptive, the quiet moments of just observing the people around her are moments of perfect acting. Her body moves with an agility that is both funny and dramatic. Her two monologues, the first with David when she informs him that she is unhappy and the second with Chuck when she asks him what's wrong, are her best scenes. The camera lingers upon her countenance and she enunciates in return with ironic ease, there is simply no stopping her.


Directed By: Lino Brocka
Screenplay: Bibeth Orteza
Cinematography: Alvaro de Guzman
Music: Tito Sotto & Boy Alcaide
Film Editor: Rene Tala
Production Design: Joey Luna
Produced By: HPS Productions
Release Date: May 28, 1982